Legal Opinion

Persyn v. Favreau

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1990No. 18097PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

This appeal followed the dismissal of Margaret Persyn’s quiet title action by the district court. The court held that the elements of adverse possession had not been proven and concluded that a fence line, which was alleged to be the easterly boundary of Persyn’s property, did not establish the true boundary of Persyn’s property. We affirm.

Persyn contends that the district court applied the wrong statute, I.C. § 5-210, in analyzing the requirements for adverse possession. Therefore, we must determine whether Persyn’s claim of adverse possession properly is under an oral claim…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wright v. MattisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1856
  2. Owen v. BoydstunIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pincock v. Pocatello Gold & Copper Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Berg v. FairmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kimball v. LohmasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carney v. HeinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Lindgren v. MartinIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Utter v. GibbinsIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wilson v. GladishIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API