Legal Opinion

Carney v. Heinson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1999No. 24362PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order by the district judge denying the appellants, Mert and Carol Carney (the Carneys), an injunction against the construction of a garage by the respondents, Darrin and Wendy Heinson (the Heinsons). The judge also denied the Carneys’ later request in their motion for reconsideration that the garage be moved.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

In July, 1975, Robert and Phyllis Smuts (the Smuts) purchased Lots No. 13 and No. 1, Block 63 in American Falls, Idaho. In April of 1978, the Smuts requested that the City of American Falls’ planning and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Marshall v. BlairIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Meisner v. Potlatch Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. White v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  5. Berg v. FairmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lunneborg v. My Fun Life, Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Great Plains Equipment, Inc. v. Northwest Pipeline Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. C & G, INC. v. RuleIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Lindberg v. RosethIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Trees v. KerseyIdaho Supreme Court · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API