State v. Ross, Unpublished Decision (12-18-2006)

OPINION

{¶ 1} This is an appeal from a finding of guilty after a no contest plea following the denial of a motion to suppress as to one count of a per se violation of R.C. § 4511.19.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE

{¶ 2} Appellant had been cited by Ohio State Trooper Spackey on June 7, 2005, who observed Appellant weaving in his lane of traffic and crossing the marked lanes of travel.

{¶ 3} Such Trooper, upon stopping Appellant, noticed an odor of alcohol, lack of eye contact and red and glassy eyes.

{¶ 4} Appellant acknowledged the prior consumption of alcohol.

{¶ 5} Field sobriety tests were…