Hagopian v. Samuelson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
Two questions are here presented: May a wife under any circumstances during the lifetime of her husband maintain an action for loss of services arising from personal injuries of a child through the negligence of a defendant? If so, does the amended complaint herein state facts sufficient to justify the maintenance of this action?
Its allegations, so far as material to these questions, are:
“ Third. That Vahrom Hagopian hereinafter mentioned is plaintiff’s son, an infant under the age of fourteen years. * * *
“ Sixth. That plaintiff’s husband, the said infant’s father, has not contributed any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Oppenheim v. . KridelNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Osterhoudt v. OsterhoudtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
- O'Rourke v. John Hancock Mut. Life InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Osterhoudt v. . OsterhoudtNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
3Cited by6 opinions
- Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Shor v. BillingsleyNew York Supreme Court · 1956
- Winnick v. Kupperman Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York Family Court · 1940
- Jeacock v. SchorbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.