Legal Opinion

Hagopian v. Samuelson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 28, 1932PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.

Two questions are here presented: May a wife under any circumstances during the lifetime of her husband maintain an action for loss of services arising from personal injuries of a child through the negligence of a defendant? If so, does the amended complaint herein state facts sufficient to justify the maintenance of this action?

Its allegations, so far as material to these questions, are:

“ Third. That Vahrom Hagopian hereinafter mentioned is plaintiff’s son, an infant under the age of fourteen years. * * *
“ Sixth. That plaintiff’s husband, the said infant’s father, has not contributed any…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oppenheim v. . KridelNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Osterhoudt v. OsterhoudtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  3. O'Rourke v. John Hancock Mut. Life InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
  4. Osterhoudt v. . OsterhoudtNew York Court of Appeals · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Woods v. LancetNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Shor v. BillingsleyNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Winnick v. Kupperman Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  4. Anonymous v. AnonymousNew York Family Court · 1940
  5. Jeacock v. SchorbAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API