Winnick v. Kupperman Construction Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtChrist, Acting P. J.
The principal question presented is whether an owner of a motor vehicle which permitted its employee to use it may be held liable to an unemancipated infant child of the employee for the latter’s negligence in the operation of the vehicle. The court below answered the question in the affirmative.
The third-party defendant, Albert Winnick, is the infant plaintiff’s father and president .of the owner, the defendant and third-party plaintiff Atlas Auto Repair Service, Inc. While he was operating a car owned by Atlas with its permission, his 15-year-old passenger daughter was injured due to his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- De Brauwere v. . De BrauwereNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Schubert v. August Schubert Wagon Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Gochee v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Cannon v. CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Sorrentino v. SorrentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Triolo v. Nassau CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2022
- Flippin v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Mr. And Mrs. Albert N. Wright, Mother and Father, Respectively, of Douglas Wright, a Minor v. Standard Oil Company, Inc., a Kentucky CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Clough v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Schwartz v. S. Lipkin & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.