Legal Opinion

Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Holmes

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 6, 2008No. 07SC263PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Martinez

I. Introduction

Gary Holmes's vacation home was damaged when a rubber hose that was part of an embedded heating system began to leak in 1993. After the hose continued to leak for several years, despite numerous repairs, Holmes replaced the entire heating system in 2001 and 2002. In a suit against the manufacturer of the hose, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company ("Goodyear"), Holmes sought and recovered the costs of replacing. the heating system. Holmes also moved for prejudgment interest under section 5-12-102, C.R.S. (2008), as of the date of the installation of the hose in 1991, but the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mesa Sand & Gravel Co. v. Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. Todd v. Bear Valley Village ApartmentsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. Loughridge v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  4. Kudrna v. Comet Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Seaward Const. Co., Inc. v. BradleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Valley Forge Insurance v. Health Care Management Partners, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
  2. Beckie Price v. High Pointe Oil Co IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2013
  3. USAA v. ParkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  4. Ferrellgas, Inc. v. YeiserSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. Casper Lodging, LLC v. AkersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API