Legal Opinion

Verissimo v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided June 26, 2003No. 02-2151PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Petitioner Manuel Verissimo appeals pro se from the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. We affirm, substantially for the reasons stated in the magistrate judge’s August 7, 2002, report and recommendation, which the district court accepted on August 28, 2002. We add only the following comments.

The government argues that this court lacks jurisdiction over Petitioner’s claims because Petitioner failed to exhaust these claims before the administrative agency pursuant to Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Breard v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Committee of United States Citizens Living in Nicaragua v. Ronald Wilson Reagan, President of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
  3. Valli Kandiah Ravindran v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. United States v. Charles George Trucking Co., Charles George, Sr. And Dorothy GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  5. United States v. AdemajCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Verissimo v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API