Legal Opinion

Electrical Products Consolidated v. Howell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 6, 1941No. 14,780Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Otto Bock

In this action, Electrical Products Consolidated, plaintiff in error, to which we hereinafter refer as plaintiff, seeks an injunction against W. Q. Howell, defendant in error, hereinafter designated as defendant, restraining him from violating an express covenant contained in a contract of employment as a salesman. Defendant demurred to the second amended complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, which demurrer the trial court sustained. Plaintiff elected to stand on its pleading and judgment was entered in favor of defendant. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
  2. Freudenthal v. EspeySupreme Court of Colorado · 1909
  3. Corpin v. WheatleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  4. Axelson v. Columbine Laundry Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API