Legal Opinion · Dissent
Mays v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 13, 1950Published
1DissentHammer, J.
I dissent and vote for affirmance. In my opinion bailment and contributory negligence were questions of fact (Hasbrouck v. New York Central & Hudson Riv. R. R. Co., 202 N. Y. 363; Reisinger v. Pullman Co., 248 App. Div. 171, 252 App. Div. 87).
Pécora, J., concurs with Eder, J.; Hammer, J., dissents in memorandum.
Judgment reversed, etc.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hasbrouck v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
- Reisinger v. Pullman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Reisinger v. Pullman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936