Legal Opinion
Reisinger v. Pullman Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 1, 1937PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCohn, J.
At the first trial of this action the trial justice directed a verdict in favor of the defendant at the close of the whole case. Upon appeal to this court the judgment entered on the directed verdict was reversed and a new trial was ordered upon the ground that there were issues of fact which should have been submitted to the jury (Reisinger v. Pullman Co., 248 App. Div. 171). This court thereafter granted defendant’s motion to resettle the order of reversal so as to specifically order a new trial “ upon all questions of fact, including the questions of fact as to bailment, negligence and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Honig v. RileyNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Springer v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
- Reisinger v. Pullman Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Corp. v. BallonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Mays v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1950
- First National City Bank v. Frederics-Helton Travel Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
- Arnold v. Kensington Plaza Garages, Inc., New York County Courts1943
- Sherber v. Kinney Systems, Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.