Legal Opinion

Warren Ex Rel. v. Dist. Ct.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1936No. 3157Published

1Opinion of the Court

Petitioners respectfully submit to the court the following authorities upon their application for a writ of mandamus: Kelly v. Ferguson (Okla.), 114 P. 631; Gehlert v. Quinn (Mont.),98 P. 369; Ex Parte Ellis (Okla.), 105 P. 184; State v. District Court (Mont.), 147 P. 614; Murdica v. State (Wyo.), 137 P. 574; Bedolfe v. Bedolfe (Wash.), 127 P. 594; Huhn v. Irvin (Wyo.), 128 P. 514; State ex rel. Carroll v. District Court (Mont.), 148 P. 312; Beeler v. Smith (Wash.), 136 P. 678; Stephens v. Stephens (Ariz.), 152 P. 164; Sherman v. District Court (Mont.), 152 P. 32; Bitter Root V.I. Co. v.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Stephens v. StephensArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bedolfe v. BedolfeWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State Ex Rel. Palmer v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Ex Parte EllisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Washoe Copper Co. v. HickeyMontana Supreme Court · 1912

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API