Legal Opinion

Crigler v. Shepler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 10, 1909No. 15,939PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Error from Barton district court; Jermain W. Brinckerhoff, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Benson, J.:

The defendants, Crigler & Crigler, wholesale liquor dealers at Covington, Ky., employed the plaintiff, Shepler, as a traveling salesman to solicit in Kansas orders for whisky to be shipped from Kentucky to the persons so ordering it. He sued for commissions. The court found that the orders were taken in contravention of section 2479 of the General Statutes of 1901, but that this section was unconstitutional, and gave judgment for the plaintiff for the amount of such commissions.

The defendants contend that the statute is valid, and that the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gelpcke v. DubuqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Douglass v. County of PikeSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Delamater v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Ohio Life Insurance & Trust Co. v. DeboltSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
  5. Haskett v. MaxeyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mickel v. New England Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
  2. Christopher v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  3. Jackson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1930
  4. Cline v. Ashland, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  5. State v. ShermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API