Legal Opinion

Irvin Ex Rel. Irvin v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 21, 2001No. 85,063Published

1Opinion of the Court

272 Kan. 112 (2001)

31 P.3d 934

ASHLEY IRVIN, a Minor Child, by and through her Parents and Legal Guardians, DAVID IRVIN and KIM IRVIN, and DAVID IRVIN and KIM IRVIN, Individually, Appellants/Cross-appellees,

v.

LINDALL E. SMITH, M.D., Appellee/Cross-appellant,

and RICHARD C. GILMARTIN, M.D., Appellee.

No. 85,063.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed September 21, 2001.

William J. Skepnek, of Skepnek Law Firm, P.A., of Lawrence, argued the cause, and Ted F. Fay, of the same firm, was with him on the briefs for appellant/cross-appellee.

Jay F. Fowler, of Foulston & Siefkin L.L.P., of Wichita, argued…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999
  3. Tracy v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. St. John v. PopeTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Honeycutt v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API