Legal Opinion

A.D. v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 2, 2021No. Civil Action No. 2020-2765Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA A.D., et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 20-cv-2765 (BAH) v. Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs, A.D., a special-education eligible student residing in the District of Columbia, and her parents, E.D. and C.D., are before this Court asserting their rights, under 20 U.S.C. § 1415(j), the “stay-put” provision of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”). 1 They seek to maintain the student’s current educational placement at The Lab School of Washington, see Pls.’…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pearl Murphy and Theodore Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Susquenita School District v. Raelee S., by and Through Her Parents and Next Friends, Heidi S. And Byron SCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  5. Murphy v. Arlington Central School District Board of EducationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API