Legal Opinion

Medical Capital Corp. v. MRI Global Imaging, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 3, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of *483contract, the plaintiffs Deajess Medical Imaging, PC., Boston Fost Road Medical Imaging, PC., Freferred Medical Imaging, PC., Robert Scott Schepp, M.D., PC., and Robert Scott Schepp appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated June 25, 2007, as, upon granting their motion to direct the defendants to deliver to them the magnetic resonance imaging films of their patients, imposed conditions, including a requirement that they specifically identify the patients whose films were to be delivered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Waldron v. Ball Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Rubin v. Alamo Rent-A-CarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Gerson v. New York Women's Medical, P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chervonskaya v. BentleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API