Legal Opinion

Phillabaum v. Lake Erie & Western Railroad

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1924No. 16086PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

This is an action for damages based on a violation of the Federal Safety Appliance act, which makes it unlawful for any railroad engaged in interstate commerce to use a car not equipped with couplers coupling automatically by impact. The Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, defendant in error, is a common carrier engaged in interstate commerce, and at the time of the injury in question Henry Phillabaum, plaintiff in error, was employed by defendant in error in a switching movement. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of plaintiff in error in the circuit court of Peoria county. On…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. LaackIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Grand Trunk Western Railway Co. v. LindsaySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  3. Seith v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Morrison v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Merlo v. Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Neering v. I.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Greene v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Illinois Central R. R. Co. v. OswaldIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Briske v. Village of BurnhamIllinois Supreme Court · 1942

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API