Legal Opinion
Goldberg v. Goldberg
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 18, 1925No. 4492PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, P. J.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) Under the evidence in this case and the deductions which the trial judge- was authorized to draw from it, the judgment of the court below must be affirmed. It is unnecessary to discuss here the principles underlying this decision. In cases cited below the questions involved have been discussed in decisions by this court and other courts of this country. A full discussion of one of the main questions *765underlying the case will be found in the decision in the case of Saunders System v. Drive It Yourself Co., 158 Ga. 1 (123 S. E. 132), where the writer of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Saunders System Atlanta Co. v. Drive It Yourself Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. T. M. Bissell Plow Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Michigan · 1902
- Rome Machine & Foundry Co. v. Davis Foundry & Machine WorksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John R. Thompson Co., Doing Business as and Through Its Wholly Owned Subsidiaries Holloway House, Inc. v. Mrs. Lee Holloway, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Atlanta Paper Co. v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1937
- Industrial Investment Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Baker Realty Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972