Legal Opinion

Forty North Center Partners v. Maricopa County

Arizona Tax Court

Decided March 30, 1989No. TX 88-00532PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORONEY, Judge.

The plaintiff has filed a complaint seeking to appeal a real property valuation *592made by the Maricopa County Assessor. The Assessor’s valuation was made pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-221(D). No administrative appeals were taken by the plaintiff. The statutory authority under which the plaintiff now seeks to appeal the Assessor's determination is found in A.R.S. § 42-246. A.R.S. § 42-246 provides that “any person dissatisfied with the valuation or classification of his property as determined by the County Assessor may ... appeal to the Superior Court in the manner provided in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cty. of Pima v. State Dept. of Revenue, Etc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  2. City of Phoenix v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Allred v. Maricopa CountyArizona Tax Court · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maricopa County v. Arizona Tax CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  2. Allred v. Maricopa CountyArizona Tax Court · 1989
  3. Roger Road Partners v. Pima CountyArizona Tax Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API