Legal Opinion

Roger Road Partners v. Pima County

Arizona Tax Court

Decided August 7, 1989No. TX 89-00016Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MORONEY, Judge.

The plaintiffs have filed suit pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-204(C) seeking to recover what the plaintiffs allege is an illegal tax. In essence, the plaintiffs’ claim that the valuation set on their property by the State Board of Tax Appeals was determined by the Board without jurisdiction to do so.

The plaintiffs appealed the Assessor’s determination of the value of the plaintiffs’ property to the Pima County Assessor pursuant to A.R.S. § 42-221. In such appeal, the plaintiffs identified their attorney as their representative. The plaintiffs did not prevail before the Pima…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arizona Department of Revenue v. Navopache Electric Co-Op, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
  2. Allred v. Maricopa CountyArizona Tax Court · 1989
  3. Forty North Center Partners v. Maricopa CountyArizona Tax Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API