State Ex Rel. Connall v. Roth
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
Two individuals were indicted separately and charged with first degree murder by the grand jury of Multnomah county. Each applied for bail. At the bail hearing the district attorney presented only the grand jury indictments and contended that the indictments alone were sufficient to deny bail. The circuit judge concluded that the state had not established that the proof or presumption of guilt of the defendants of murder was evident or strong under the Oregon Constitution and set bail for each accused in the amount of $150,000.
The district attorney applied to this court for alternative writs…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. MenilloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Bozovichar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- State v. KonigsbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- In Re SteiglerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Westerman v. CaryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Priest v. PearceOregon Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. ArthurSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- Application of HaynesOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Fountaine v. MullenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.