Legal Opinion

State v. Robles

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1995No. Crim. 940331PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVINE, Justice.

On appeal, Jaime Robles asks us to reverse his conviction for aggravated assault, because the panel from which his jury was selected was not a fair cross-section of the community and thus violated his statutory rights under N.D.C.C. Ch. 27-09.1 and his right to an impartial jury under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We conclude Robles has failed to show that the procedure used to select the jury venire violated N.D.C.C. Ch. 27-09.1, or that he was denied his constitutional right to an impartial jury. Accordingly, we affirm.

On April 24, 1994, Robles…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. Anthony Esparsen, United States of America v. Kelly Esparsen, United States of America v. Robert McFaddenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GomezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Estate of HaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. SchwabNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API