Porterfield v. Trustees of Hospital of University of Pennsylvania
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
DEL SOLE, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order entering Summary Judgment in favor of Appellees. The court concluded that a general release signed in connection with an automobile accident case barred the Appellant’s subsequent claim for alleged medical malpractice arising out of treatment received following the accident. Because we agree with the court’s conclusion that the “breadth and the generality of the language used to describe the released parties” serves as a bar to recovery against a successive tortfeasor, we affirm.
The main thrust of Appellant’s argument before this court is that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Nanty-Glo Boro. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Penn Center House, Inc. v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Garcia v. SavageSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Vaughn v. DidizianSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Harrity v. Medical College of Pennsylvania HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gruenwald v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ford Motor Co. v. BusemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- First Philson Bank, N.A. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Cline v. Statler, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Adams County1997
- Butterfield v. Meadville Medical Center, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Crawford County1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.