Legal Opinion
Hannahville Indian Community v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 9, 1967No. Appeal No. 5-65; Ind. Cl. Comm. Docket Nos. 29D, E, J and KPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beed, Justice (Bet.),
delivered the opinion of the court:
This appeal from various orders of the Indian Claims Commission is brought to this court in accordance with Section 20(b) of the Indian Claims Commission Act.1 The appellants2 seek recognition of a right to share in awards which are being sought from the Commission as additional consideration for lands ceded to the United States by the Potawatomies, or groups thereof, in the treaties of July 4, 1805, 7 Stat. 87; November 17,1807, 7 Stat. 105; August 29, 1821,7 Stat. 218; and July 29,1829,7 Stat. 320.
A majority of the Commission has held…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Moran Towing & Transportation Co. v. Navigazione Libera Triestina, S. A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
- Osage Nation of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- International Refugee Organization v. Republic S. S. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
- Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
- Russell v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Masco Corporation v. United States, and Mosler, Inc. And Hamilton Products Group, Inc., Third Party and Mas-Hamilton Group, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Speyer, Inc. v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Standard Oil Co. of California v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- Pottawatomie Nation of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Masco Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003