Legal Opinion

Keil v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 7, 1993No. 92CA0639PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DAVIDSON.

Edwin W. Keil, claimant, was discharged from his employment with respondent, Met-west, Inc., for refusing to comply with a reasonable instruction. He seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel which disqualified him from the receipt of unemployment compensation benefits, contending primarily that respondent’s failure to comply with its three-step discipline policy requires that he be awarded benefits. We disagree and affirm.

I

We first conclude that the hearing officer did not err in finding that claimant should be disqualified pursuant to §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Continental Air Lines, Inc. v. KeenanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  2. Martin Marietta Corp. v. LorenzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  3. Industrial Commission v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  4. Cronk v. Intermountain Rural Electric Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. Tuttle v. ANR Freight System, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cole v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Velo v. Employment Solutions PersonnelColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Board of Water Commissioners v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Padilla v. Digital Equipment Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Mesa County Public Library District v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API