Legal Opinion
Padilla v. Digital Equipment Corp.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 25, 1995No. 93CA1536PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge HUME.
Petitioner, Augusto Padilla, seeks review of a final order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel which denied petitioner any award of temporary total disability benefits. We affirm the Panel.
Petitioner suffered an occupational injury while in the employ of respondent Digital Equipment Corporation. As a result, petitioner was physically restricted from performing his regular duties but continued in respondent’s employ in a limited duty capacity commensurate with his ability.
Petitioner was terminated from employment on April 7, 1992. The Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Allee v. Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- Gonzales v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATESupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Monfort of Colorado v. HussonColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
- Keil v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
- Roe v. Industrial Com'n of StateColorado Court of Appeals · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Colorado Springs Disposal v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office of ColoradoColorado Court of Appeals · 2002
- Gilmore v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Padilla v. Digital Equipment Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Longmont Toyota v. INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALSColorado Court of Appeals · 2004