Legal Opinion
Cytec Industries, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided April 5, 2002No. C2-00-1398PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GRAHAM, District Judge.
Cytec Industries, Inc. (“Cytec”) brings this action arising under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERC-LA”), as amended by The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq., against The B.F. Goodrich Company (“Goodrich”). Cytec seeks to recover contribution from Goodrich, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(1), for costs it incurred in the investigation and remediation of contamination of hazardous waste at its facility in Marietta, Ohio. Cytec also seeks a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lavaughn Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cytec Industries, Inc. v. B.F. Goodrich Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Carrier Corp. v. PiperDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Kennedy v. City of Zanesville, OHDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2007
- Bizfunds, L.L.C. v. Jetmo, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Bizfunds, L.L.C. v. Jetmo, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.