Legal Opinion

Hogue v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 30, 1964No. 40702PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRWIN, Justice.

Victor B. Hogue, Administrator of the Estate of Victor Lyle Hogue, deceased, filed a claim with the State Industrial Court to recover death benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, for and on behalf of himself and his wife, as the only dependent heirs of the deceased. A trial judge denied the claim on the grounds that neither Victor B. Hogue, nor his wife, was a dependent of the decedent. On appeal to the Commission en banc, the order denying the award was adopted and affirmed. The Petition for Review challenges the correctness of the order denying compensation.

FACTS

Mr.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. G. I. Construction Co. v. OsbornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  2. Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syndicate, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. Cimarron Telephone Co. v. NanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
  4. Oklahoma State Highway Department v. NashSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
  5. Boardman Company v. EddySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wheat v. Heritage ManorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  2. Daugherty v. ITT Continental Baking CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  3. Cox v. State Industrial CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
  4. McBride v. L. R. McBride Eng., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API