Legal Opinion

Shaver v. Shaver

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1956No. 666PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

The movant, Carpenter, is a stranger to this cause. He is neither party nor privy.

The general rule is that a stranger to the record, who is neither a party nor a privy to the action, unless authorized by statute, ordinarily has no standing to vacate a judgment by a motion in the cause. Smith v. New Bern, 73 N.C. 303; Edwards v. Phillips, 91 N.C. 355; Johnson v. Johnson, 142 N.C. 462, 55 S.E. 341; In re Bank, 208 N.C. 509, 181 S.E. 621; 49 C.J.S., Judgments, p. 540; 31 Am. Jur., Judgments sec. 722; Annotations: 99 A.L.R., p. 1310; 12 A.L.R. 2d, p. 727.

This fatal defect appears on the face of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Aiken v. SanderfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Garrison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Watson v. . Lee CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Johnson v. Johnson.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Edwards v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ward v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Shaver v. ShaverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  3. Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Manning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 1964
  5. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API