Legal Opinion

Manning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided October 26, 1964No. Civ. 2193, 2197, 2192PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Chief Judge:

These are three lawsuits brought to enforce against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company three judgments obtained in the Superior Court of North Carolina against Harley W. Meredith, Sr., an alleged “insured” of State Farm. Coverage is denied by State Farm.

MOTION TO PRODUCE UNDER RULE 34

In sixteen separate paragraphs the plaintiff Betty Jo Manning has moved, pursuant to Rule 34, for an order requiring State Farm to produce for inspection and copying numerous insurance records, reports, memoranda of investigation, statements of witnesses, and various additional…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Carpenter v. CarpenterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Queen City Coach Co. v. BurrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Nixon v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Squires v. Textile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Travelers Insur. Co. v. GodseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. LaRocca v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1969
  3. Laster v. American National Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1991
  4. Robert Yale, Ancillary Administrator of the Estate of Joseph Dudley Schofield, Deceased v. National Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
  5. Dairyland Insurance Company v. RichardsArizona Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API