Legal Opinion

Homer v. Wullenweber

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1951No. 7440PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

The defendants, Nicholas Wullenweber, Jr., Henry Wullenweber, and Christina Wullen weber Neihard, demurred to the plaintiff’s second amended petition on two grounds, first, that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and, second, that the cause of action, if it existed, was barred by the statute of limitations. The court sustained this demurrer and, the plaintiff not. desiring to plead further, judgment was entered for the defendants. It is from that judgment that this appeal is taken.

It is apparent, therefore, that the sole question on this appeal is whether the…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Peterson v. TeodosioOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Day v. BrooksCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1967
  3. Ogle v. Trustee of Ogle Irrevocable TrustOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. Spencer v. SpencerOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Hill v. IronsOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API