Legal Opinion

People v. Lauro

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan S. McNab, J.

Defendant Eugene Lauro stands charged with the crime of manslaughter in the first degree for allegedly having intentionally caused the death of his wife, Angie Lauro, with a shotgun, while acting under an extreme emotional disturbance. During trial, two novel questions of law arose; in the first, the court was asked to rule, and did rule, on the admissibility of certain evidence obtained by means of a procedure known as the "trace metal detection test;” the second, and equally unusual issue, which the court will treat first, involves the so-called "Hillmon doctrine” enunciated in Mutual Life…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. People v. CleagueNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. People v. BorreroNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. LeoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  5. People v. GowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BorcsokNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API