People v. Carbajal
California Supreme Court
1DissentMosk, J.
I dissent.
The majority conclude that when a defendant is convicted of violating Vehicle Code section 20002, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 20002), the trial court may impose restitution as a condition of probation even though the offense itself—leaving the scene of an accident—did not result in any property damage or injury. I dissent because, in my view, requiring such a defendant to pay civil damages for the underlying accident, which involved no criminal wrongdoing, serves no demonstrable rehabilitative or deterrent purpose. Instead, under these circumstances the majority would have…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. LentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- California v. ByersSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- People v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. BaumannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.