Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Local Union No. 13, Journeymen Plumbers, Gas & Steamfitters & Sprinkler Fitters

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCunningham, J.

The plaintiff seeks in this action to restrain the local union from entering into a contract with the Employers’ Association providing for the compensation to be paid to the different classes of employees and effective for one year from April 1, 1929.

The contract provides for three classes of employees, journeymen, juniors and apprentices. The plaintiff claims that under the by-laws of the National Association the classes should be limited to journeymen and apprentices and that the number of apprentices is not fixed in accordance with such by-laws.

The defendant is an unincorporated…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cabana v. Holstein-Friesian Ass'n of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Mandell v. ColeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  3. Cabana v. . Holstein-Friesian Association of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burton v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  2. New York Electrical Contractors' Ass'n v. Local Union No. 3 of International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersNew York Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Caines v. Prudential InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Madden v. AtkinsNew York Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Sims v. RansomNew York Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API