Legal Opinion

Malherek v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided July 7, 2020No. 4:18-cv-00409Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 5 6 Karen Malherek, No. CV-18-00409-TUC-CKJ 7 Plaintiff, ORDER 8 v. 9 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 10 Defendant. 11 12 13 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 21). For 14 the following reasons, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED, and this case remains CLOSED. 15 PROCEDURAL HISTORY 16 On August 16, 2018, Plaintiff filed a complaint appealing the administrative 17 decision of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration which denied her claim of 18 disability…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. 389 Orange Street Partners v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  3. Hopwood v. State of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. Teamsters Local 617 Pension & Welfare Funds v. Apollo Group, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2012
  5. Piper v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API