Legal Opinion

Fortis Benefits Ins. Co. v. Pinkley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 29, 2005No. 1040125PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fortis Benefits Insurance Company and Fortis Insurance Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Fortis") appeal by permission, pursuant to Rule 5, Ala. R.App. P., from the denial of their motion for a summary judgment in an action commenced by Bertha Bernice Pinkley, individually and as executrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Jay Donald Pinkley, to recover life-insurance benefits. We reverse and remand.

For the purpose of this appeal, we treat the following facts as undisputed. In 1991, Jay Pinkley purchased a $100,000 life-insurance policy, the obligations of which were…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. PruittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  2. Life Ins. Co. of Georgia v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  3. Miller v. Paul Revere Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Ex Parte FloydSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Dorsey v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Davis v. Sterne, Agee and Leach, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Ex Parte EstelleSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  3. Guthery v. PersallCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  4. Pabon Lugo v. Mony Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2006
  5. Baxley v. Jackson National Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2021

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API