Legal Opinion

Abbott v. Sheppard

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 15, 1869PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Third District Court. relied on 8 Cal. 449 ; 9 Cal. Ill; 12 Cal. 102, 283 ; Laws of Cal., 1850-3, §§ 30, 31, p. 524; Pomeroy v. Betts, 31 Mo. 419 ; Janney v. Spodden et al., 38 Mo. 395; 14 Wis. 591; 33 Barb. 71; 33 N. H. 228; Story’s Conflict of Laws, §§ 546, 549 ; 10 Wis. 501, 563 ; 13 Wis. 222 ; 5 Mason, 35 ; 1 Barb. 291; Douglas v. Eorrest, 686 ; 21 Yerm. 535 ; 11 How. 165 ; 5 Ga. 94; 24 Texas, 468 ; 4 Zabr. 333 ; 11 Ohio, 511; 20 Gal. 81; 22 How. 352 ; 22 Mo.…

Read the full summary

Error to Third District Court. relied on 8 Cal. 449 ; 9 Cal. Ill; 12 Cal. 102, 283 ; Laws of Cal., 1850-3, §§ 30, 31, p. 524; Pomeroy v. Betts, 31 Mo. 419 ; Janney v. Spodden et al., 38 Mo. 395; 14 Wis. 591; 33 Barb. 71; 33 N. H. 228; Story’s Conflict of Laws, §§ 546, 549 ; 10 Wis. 501, 563 ; 13 Wis. 222 ; 5 Mason, 35 ; 1 Barb. 291; Douglas v. Eorrest, 686 ; 21 Yerm. 535 ; 11 How. 165 ; 5 Ga. 94; 24 Texas, 468 ; 4 Zabr. 333 ; 11 Ohio, 511; 20 Gal. 81; 22 How. 352 ; 22 Mo. 335. The judgment against Wooten was void. ( Smith v. McCutehen, 38 Mo. 415; Janney v. Spedden, id. 395; Latimer v. Union…

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, Judge

The petition in this case is for specific performance. Defendants sold a lot in Oreen county to one Wooten, who, as the petition alleges, paid for the same, but received no deed. The interest of said Wooten in the lot was levied on and sold upon execution, and bid in by assignor of plaintiff, and the plaintiff now seeks a deed from the original vendors. Among the defenses set up is the claim that the judgment, upon which the execution against Wooten and others was issued, was void, for the reason that no process had been served in the case; that the defendants were all non-residents of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Latimer v. Union Pacific RailwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
  2. Smith v. McCutchenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1866

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burnett v. McClueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Napton v. LeatonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Rogers v. Mercantile Adjuster Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Sevier v. RoddieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Meyer v. HartmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1883

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API