Burton v. White's Adm'r
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 3 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM MADISON CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 14 B. Mon., 84; Dodd vs. King. 1 Metcalfe, 430; Dodd vs. King CITED— Story on Promissory Notes, 257 to 276. 13 Peters' Sup. Ct. Rep., 36; Wallace vs. McDowell. 4 Wheat. Rep., 183. 17 John. R., 248. 8 Cowen, 271. 5 Leigh., 522. I Gill Sf Johnson, 175; Bowie vs. Duvall. II Wheaton, 171; Bank of U. S. vs. Smith. 4 Hals. N. J. R., 189; Weed vs. Horton. 1 New York, 502;' McNairy vs. Bell.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE ROBERTSON
delivered the opinion op the court:
This appeal seeks the reversal of a judgment on a note made payable six months after date, and filed with the petition, which, in describing it, fails to state specifically *10when it became due; and this omission is relied on as reversible error, on the supposed authority of the case of Dodd vs. King, 1st Met., 430. But there is no essential analogy between these cases. On a note executed by Dodd to Mary Bussing, King sued as if it had been executed to himself, and not as assignee; and his petition made no allusion to any assignment. The 145th…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Noble v. People's Stock & Poultry Feed Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Corbin v. Oldham's Adm'xCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
- Huffaker v. Bank of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
- Huffaker v. Bank of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876