Legal Opinion
Popa v. Calinoiu (In Re Calinoiu)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 10, 2010No. 19-10017PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS P. AGRESTI, United States Chief Bankruptcy Judge.
Currently before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (“Motion”) filed by the Debtor/Defendant, Mihaela M. Cali-noiu (“Debtor”) at Document No. 20 in reference to the Complaint Objecting to Dischargeability of Debt Pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523 filed by Greta Popa (“Popa” or “Plaintiff’). 1 Plaintiff seeks a denial of discharge of the Debtor’s obligation to her pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2). For the reasons that follow, the Court will deny the Motion.
Factual Background
This action arises from an installment sales…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- KRUPSKI v. COSTA CROCIERE S. P. ASupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Frowen v. BlankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Barrazo v. Carter (In re Carter)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico · 2014
- Formador, Inc. v. Leida Aminta Ortiz FrancoUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2019
- Kruger Packaging, L.P. v. John Richard PerulloUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2026
- Pennsylvania Lawyers Fund for Client Security v. Moore (In Re Moore)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011