Legal Opinion

Wistrom v. Forsling

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1944No. 31524PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

Our first opinion in this- case will be found in 143 Neb. 294, 9 N. W. 2d 294. In that opinion we determined that the petition filed in the municipal court in Lincoln was sufficient to. confer jurisdiction over the plaintiff who was served with process in Kimball county. In determining that question we said that the petition in the municipal court “did state a joint cause of action against Carr and the plaintiff here and that on the basis of the petition summons was properly issued for service in Kimball county, Nebraska.” On motion for a rehearing it is pointed out that an endorser of a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Barry v. WachoskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Dryden v. ParrotteNebraska Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Richardson v. WarnerNebraska Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Brandeen v. LauNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Witte v. BrozNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Schilke v. School District No. 107Nebraska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Gergen v. Western Union Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. State Ex Rel. Southeast Rural Fire Protection District v. GrossmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Gasper v. MazurNebraska Supreme Court · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API