Legal Opinion

Brandeen v. Lau

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1924No. 24134PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dean, j.

This is the second appearance of this case in this court. The former opinion, under Brandeen v. Beale, is reported in 110 Neb. 686, to which reference is had for a statement of the material facts, which do not need to be repeated here.

When the mandate was issued from this court, after argument on the first submission, defendants Beale and Lau filed a motion in the county court, January 7, 1924, wherein they jointly moved “for an order nunc pro tunc” that a substituted decree be filed for the decree appointing the guardian, which was “filed June 22, 1921, to conform to the actual…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. CootsNebraska Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Nelson v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Hyde v. MichelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Donnelly v. Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the WorldNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Phelps v. WolffNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Filer v. StatzNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Carlson v. BartelsNebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Brandeen v. BealeNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Cacek v. MunsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API