Legal Opinion
Chew v. Eagan
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided December 2, 1916PublishedCited by 6 opinions
On bill for relief. On bearing on motion to strike out.
1Opinion of the Court
Leaking, Y. C.
Pursuant to rule 213 a motion has been made in behalf of defendant Lillie V. Eagan to strike out paragraphs 4. and 5 of complainant’s bill of complaint upon the ground that the two paragraphs named are “scandalous and impertinent.”. The bill has been filed by Irene E. Chew against her husband, William E. Chew, and his alleged illicit paramour, Lillie Y. Eagan, for the purpose of establishing by decree of this court that certain real estate, the legal title to which stands in the name of Lillie Y. Eagan, is in fact owned by complainant’s husband. The object of the suit is to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hawley v. WolvertonNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bean v. Central Maine Power Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
- DeGroot v. MuccioNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Miller v. United States Casualty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1900
- Griffing v. A. A. Griffing Iron Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1901
- Hague v. WarrenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.