Moseley v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
GUITTARD, Chief Justice.
Appellant appeals his conviction for driving while intoxicated, contending that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the result of a chemical breath analysis (hereinafter referred to as a breath test), in failing to submit his requested jury instruction regarding this breath test, and in admitting evidence of the breath-test operator’s certification. We disagree with all of appellant’s contentions and affirm his conviction.
All of appellant’s grounds of error are based on section 3(b) of former article 6701 / -5 (hereinafter referred to as section 3(b)), the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- McMahon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Dick v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Slagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Leday v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
- Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Rezac v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Hewitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
- Gifford v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.