Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mendez

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 21, 2000PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 On this appeal we determine whether a defendant convicted of driving under suspension/DUI related, and subject to a mandatory term of imprisonment may receive credit for time voluntarily served in intermediate punishment, thereby decreasing the duration of his prison term. We conclude that the sentencing code does not permit such a credit.

¶2 The Commonwealth appeals from the judgment of sentence imposed following Joseph Mendez’s plea of guilty to driving under suspension (DUS). 75 Pa. C.S. § 1543(b)(1). The Commonwealth argues that the trial court erred by crediting Mendez…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ConahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. CozzoneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. ShartleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Commonwealth v. MinconeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Commonwealth v. DeckerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. KoskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API