Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State ex rel. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1954No. 33933Published

1ConcurrenceTaft, J.

Under the law, as announced in State, ex rel. Allied Wheel Products, Inc., v. Industrial Commission, 161 Ohio St., 555, 120 N. E. (2d), 421, and State, ex rel. D. L. Auld Co., Inc., v. Morse et al., Industrial Commission, 161 Ohio St., 561, 120 N. E. (2d), 424, is anyone “prevented,” within the meaning of the last sentence of Section 2 of Article IV of the Ohio Constitution, “from invoking the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court” in mandamus? Certainly, the law, as announced in those cases, may •require the denial by the Supreme Court of a writ of mandamus requested by a party…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stanley v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Carmody v. JusticeOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  3. HighMichigan Supreme Court · 1847
  4. State Ex Rel. First National Bank v. Village of BotkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1943
  5. State Ex Rel. Harrison v. PerryOhio Supreme Court · 1925

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API