Legal Opinion

People v. Lugo

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 26, 2009No. 2-07-0296PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE ZENOFF

delivered the opinion of the court:

This appeal presents the question of whether the proof of mailing requirements of Supreme Court Rule 373 (155 Ill. 2d R. 373) can be satisfied by a postmark affixed to an envelope taped to the back of a notice of appeal. We conclude that it cannot.

BACKGROUND

Defendant, Joe H. Lugo, was indicted on three counts of solicitation of murder for hire (720 ILCS 5/8 — 1.2(a) (West 2000)). On May 14, 2002, defendant pleaded guilty to count I and the trial court granted the State’s motion to nol-pros counts II and III. Following its denial of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of RennickIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. RobertsIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. ThomasIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  4. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Harrisburg-Raleigh Airport Authority v. Department of RevenueIllinois Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Kinesoft Development Corp. v. Softbank Holdings Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  2. People v. HansenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. People v. HumphreyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020
  4. People v. MaidenAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  5. People v. WalkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API