Legal Opinion

Jaussaud v. Samuels

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1937No. 6464PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorgan, C. J.

In the transcript and briefs the names of the parties have not been stated in the order prescribed by Supreme Court Rule No. 37, which requires: “The original title, with the names of the parties in the same order, shall be retained in this court, substituting for the words plaintiff or defendant, appellant or respondent, as the case may be.” The title has been reformed to conform to that rule.

Prior to February 13, 1928, appellants were the owners of a tract of more than 9,000 acres of land in Bonner county. That day they mortgaged it to E. H. & W. C. Dewey Investment Company, a corporation,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shaner v. Rathdrum State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Reid v. KeatorIdaho Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Dickens v. HestonIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Cannon v. SeyboldtIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Ennor v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1867

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hogg v. WolskeIdaho Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Shurrum v. WattsIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gem-Valley Ranches, Inc. v. SmallIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Eastern Idaho Production Credit Ass'n v. Placerton, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Quintana v. AnthonyIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API