Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Scholler v. City of Long Beach

California Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1909No. L.A. No. 2239PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This is an action in quo warranto to determine the right of the defendant, as a municipal corporation, to exercise corporate jurisdiction and control over certain adjacent territory comprising a seaside summer resort now usually known as Terminal Island.

A proceeding was had under the act of March 19, 1889 (Stats. 1889, p. 358), for the purpose of annexing this territory to the city of Long Beach. An election to determine such annexation was held on August 16, 1905. In the territory proposed to be annexed the election officers made return that 73 votes were cast in favor of the annexation and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. West v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. People v. MaynardMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  3. State v. LeathermanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1881
  4. Jameson v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1855
  5. People ex rel. Adams v. City of OaklandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Weber v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Ferrini v. City of San Luis ObispoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. L.I.F.E. Committee v. City of LodiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API