United States v. Misael Rodriguez
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Per curiam
Defendant Misael Rodriguez argues on this appeal that the district court improperly held that he could not obtain a reduction of his offense level for “acceptance of responsibility” under the federal Sentencing Guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, because he pled guilty while maintaining his innocence under what is known as an “Alford plea.” Although we are inclined to think that such a per se rule would not be consistent with the intent of the guidelines, it is not necessary to address the question in this case. A review of the record reveals that the sentencing judge did not treat the Alford plea…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. David Big Crow, United States of America v. David Big CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Robert Spraggins, A/K/A Bob StaggsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. James Edgar FleenerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Ed HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. ThayerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Jesus Castillo-Valencia, and Jose Pulido-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Noel Barron-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Michael Rudolph CruzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.