Legal Opinion

United States v. Misael Rodriguez

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 10, 1990No. 89-5443PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant Misael Rodriguez argues on this appeal that the district court improperly held that he could not obtain a reduction of his offense level for “acceptance of responsibility” under the federal Sentencing Guidelines, U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, because he pled guilty while maintaining his innocence under what is known as an “Alford plea.” Although we are inclined to think that such a per se rule would not be consistent with the intent of the guidelines, it is not necessary to address the question in this case. A review of the record reveals that the sentencing judge did not treat the Alford plea…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. David Big Crow, United States of America v. David Big CrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Robert Spraggins, A/K/A Bob StaggsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. James Edgar FleenerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Ed HowardCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. ThayerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  3. United States v. Jesus Castillo-Valencia, and Jose Pulido-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Noel Barron-RiveraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Michael Rudolph CruzCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API