Legal Opinion
United States v. James Edgar Fleener
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided May 9, 1990No. 89-5474PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUHRHEINRICH, District Judge.
Appellant United States appeals the sentence of appellee James Edgar Fleener (“Fleener”) claiming that the district court incorrectly applied the Federal Sentencing Guidelines 1 (“the Guidelines”) in reducing Fleener’s offense level for acceptance of responsibility. We affirm.
I
In May of 1988, as part of an effort to identify persons involved in the sexual exploitation of children, particularly individuals in the military, Special Agent Pamela Dickenson (“Dickenson”) of the Naval Investigative Service (“NIS”) in San Diego, California, placed the following ad in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. Melody ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Lawrence WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. William D. Davis, United States of America v. Curry James WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. BaltasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Dwight P. ChandlerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Joseph Spriggs, IIICourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. RosaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.