Legal Opinion

Herndon v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 12, 1998No. A98A2183PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Joseph Andre Herndon appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion for a new trial, contending he received ineffective assistance of counsel during his trial. Herndon has failed to show that trial counsel’s performance was deficient and that any of the alleged deficiencies prejudiced his defense. We affirm.

“In order to establish ineffectiveness of trial counsel under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U. S. 668, 687 (104 SC 2052, 80 LE2d 674) (1984), [Herndon] must show both that counsel’s performance was deficient and that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Redd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. Bridges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. Robinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  5. Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Gosnell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Pippins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Wright v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
  4. Leonard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  5. Lemming v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API